By Seira Tamang As noted by various scholars, Hinduism, the Nepali language, the monarchy and a rastriya itihas (a chronicle of progress in which the dark era of Rana rule is contrasted with the enlightened, progressive and modern period of Panchayat rule) formed the core of the Panchayat regime’s national culture. The formation and consolidation of this national culture have required the expunging of uncomfortable facts and stories that might raise ambiguities and questions. While the selection of what and who is and is not acknowledged to exist (or at least exist in historically important ways) in official Nepali history is complex, social scientists have begun to provide more comprehensive historical accounts of the past through oral histories and re-readings of historical documents. Such accounts reveal how ordinary people lived in the past, and offer ways to think through how ‘history’ is crafted, shaped and managed in order to reflect ‘the reality’ best suited to the status quo, ...
Proud to be a Sikkimese is the definitive digital encyclopedia of Sikkim State. Since 2007, we have archived the rich heritage of the Himalayas, from the history of the Namgyal dynasty to the vibrant cultures of the Lepcha, Bhutia, and Nepali communities. Explore expert insights on Sikkim travel, Buddhist monasteries, folklore, and biodiversity.

Our Late King and the "TRAITOR"!!!
ReplyDeletewhy so??
ReplyDeleteSome call the queen the traitor because she left him when the king needed her the most.
ReplyDeleteIs there any sentiment today among the people of Sikkim for regaining their independence? Is there any support for restoring the monarchy? Or are the people content with their present status as a state of India?
ReplyDeleteI write this as an American who wishes to learn more about Sikkim.
Here are two links about Sikkim:
ReplyDeletehttp://www.nepalitimes.com.np/issue/35/Nation/9621
and
http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,913029,00.html
By the way this is not the first time India grab other people's land. Tibetans were victims of India aggression too.
"In October 1947, they [the Tibetans] formally requested India to return their territory from Ladakh to Assam, and including Sikkim. The Indians in return simply asked Tibet to continue the relationship on the basis of the previous British Government." see pg 7 of India's China war by Neville Maxwell.
Again,
"In response to the protests of the Tibetan authorities in Lhasa, the Indian officials stated that India was taking over Tawang. The Tibetans protested again that they "deeply regret and absolutely cannot accept” what the Indian government "seizing as its own what did not belong to it." The Indian government ignored the protests, forced the Tibetan administration out, and stayed on in Tawang, as the British did in Dirang Dzong in 1944." see pg 8 of India's China war by Neville Maxwell.
http://www.scribd.com/doc/12249475/Indias-China-War-Neville-Maxwell
By the way India aggression to her neighbors is not confined to Sikkim. China is a victim too. But China is big enough to defend herself, unlike Sikkim. Please listen to this podcast, also from Neville Maxwell, author of India's China War:
ReplyDeletehttp://asiapacific.anu.edu.au/podcasts/India_China_Border.mp3
what the fuck? who said Assam was under Tibetan rule? where did u get this kind of crap...?
ReplyDeleteI think u are mistaken...Assam was never under Tibetan rule...and not even Sikkim..
ReplyDelete@Anonymous: u must be that sick, coward sikkimese who ran away during that time in 1974, and now barking at the people who are living peacefully in sikkim....u must be hiding in states in comfort and sharing ur hatred....u sick coward mi....
ReplyDeleteThat's right, fook Anonymous
Delete